Definition
Contact between the runway and the aircraft's aft fuselage or a designated tail-protection device during takeoff or landing.
Why it matters
Damage may affect primary structure and pressurization integrity, while an unrecognized strike can create latent risk.
Questions that turn reading into a defensible review
A strong review separates the event description, possible precursors, recorded evidence, approved criteria, and the final safety decision.
What exactly is being examined?
Contact between the runway and the aircraft's aft fuselage or a designated tail-protection device during takeoff or landing.
Which conditions could build the exposure?
Early or rapid rotation; High pitch after bounce or low-speed flare.
What evidence would strengthen the picture?
Pitch and pitch rate near liftoff/touchdown Airspeed, roll, radio altitude, and gear ground states
What must remain authoritative?
Current approved aircraft data, operator procedures, investigation findings, and the source document’s own scope control any operational conclusion.
Timeline, aircraft state, relationships, and recurrence
Radio altitude, Calibrated airspeed, Pitch attitude, Roll angle, Landing gear status can contribute to a synchronized event picture when their mappings, units, sampling, and flight-phase logic are validated.
Cause, intent, compliance, and technical disposition
An FDM alert or pattern is not by itself a causal finding, judgement of individual performance, regulatory conclusion, or aircraft maintenance and airworthiness determination.
Reports, approved criteria, context, and authoritative evidence
Combine the recorded picture with applicable procedures, crew and operational reports, weather or airport information, technical evidence, and the linked official publications and investigation sources.
Tail-clearance geometry
Clearance changes with pitch, roll, gear compression, and runway geometry.
Common causes and precursors
- →
Early or rapid rotation
- →
High pitch after bounce or low-speed flare
- →
Excess pitch with compressed gear, runway slope, or crosswind roll
Operational risks
- R1
Aft-fuselage structural damage
- R2
Pressurization risk
- R3
Rejected takeoff or return to land
Guidance themes
These are cross-source themes for orientation. Apply only the current, approved material for the aircraft and operation.
- Use aircraft-specific rotation and landing technique
- Report suspected contact immediately
- Apply the controlling inspection instructions
Safety actions to consider
Train bounce recovery and rotation technique
Trend precursors by aircraft variant
Brief runway slope and crosswind threats
Parameters that help explain the event
A useful event picture comes from signal relationships—not a single exceedance or a generic threshold.
Radio altitude
Radio altitude provides the low-height reference needed to align approach gates, flare, touchdown, warning, and go-around events.
Open parameter guide ↗ktCalibrated airspeed
Speed relative to the applicable target and configuration is central to energy management, approach stability, runway performance, and stall margin.
Open parameter guide ↗degPitch attitude
Pitch shows rotation, flare, stall response, and potential tail-clearance context when combined with gear geometry and radio altitude.
Open parameter guide ↗degRoll angle
Near the runway, roll angle affects wingtip or engine clearance, crosswind alignment, touchdown sequence, and lateral control margins.
Open parameter guide ↗discreteLanding gear status
Gear and weight-on-wheels transitions anchor takeoff, touchdown, bounce, go-around, braking, spoiler, and reverser logic.
Open parameter guide ↗Recommended monitoring questions
Pitch and pitch rate near liftoff/touchdown
Airspeed, roll, radio altitude, and gear ground states
Cases that add context
ASIP provides a concise learning index. The investigation authority report remains the definitive source.
Editor-reviewed starting points
These records include a deeper ASIP editorial review. Continue to the full evidence index below for direct matches and broader manufacturer, regulator, and investigation reading.
AC 120-82 — Flight Operational Quality Assurance
Active FAA guidance describes one acceptable way to establish a voluntary FOQA programme using de-identified aggregate flight data to identify and reduce operational risk.
Official sourceCAP 739 — Flight Data Monitoring, Second Edition
CAP 739 presents FDM as the systematic, proactive use of routine digital flight data within a non-punitive, just safety culture.
Official sourceTitle or indexed metadata explicitly matches this topic.
Related collection material for adjacent systems, phases, and defenses.
Manufacturer, regulator, investigation, and safety-organization sources.
Where the reading comes from
68 source records
Official links · no copied report files68 source records match the current evidence filters.
SAFO 10001 — Possible effects of Thickened Anti-icing Fluids on Takeoff Rotation for Airplanes withUnpowered Elevator Controls
Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for takeoff and weather. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceA Focus on the Takeoff Rotation
Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for takeoff. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceA320 Tail strike at Take-Off?
Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for takeoff. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceIncorrect pitch trim setting at takeoff
Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for takeoff and flight controls and automation. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourcePreventing Tailstrike During Go-around Near the Ground
Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for ground operations. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceSAFO 24006 — Potential for Jammed or Restricted Rudder on Boeing Model 737 Series Airplanes Equipped with Optional Collins Aerospace SVO-730 Rudder Rollout Guidance Actuators (RRGA)
Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for flight controls and automation. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceSAFO 23001 — Potential Damage to Nose Landing Gear (NLG) by Improper Towing Procedures of the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Regional Jet (MHIRJ) (formerly Bombardier) CL-600-2B19, CL-600-2C10 and CL-600-2D24 Airplanes
Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for approach and landing and ground operations. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceSAFO 23004 — Boeing Multi Operator Message (MOM); MOM-MOM-23-0179-01B and Erroneous Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) Calculation from Boeing Performance Engineer's Tool (PET) Reporters
Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for takeoff and maintenance. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceSAFO 21004 — SAFO 21004, Air Traffic Control (ATC) Notification and Pilot Awareness When Conducting an Instrument Landing System (ILS) Autoland Procedure
Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for approach and landing and human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceSAFO 18009 — SAFO 18009, Risk of Runway Number Transposition Leading to a possible "Runway Overrun" During Takeoff at San Francisco International Airport ( SFO )
Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for approach and landing and takeoff. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceSAFO 17011 — SAFO 17011, Runway Status Lights ( RWSL )
Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for approach and landing and runway safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceSAFO 17012 — SAFO 17012, High Collision Risk During Runway Crossing
Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for approach and landing and runway safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceSAFO 16008 — SAFO 16008, Reducing the Risk of Runway Excursions During Takeoff
Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for approach and landing and takeoff. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceSAFO 16009 — SAFO 16009, Runway Assessment and Condition Reporting, Effective October 1, 2016
Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for approach and landing and runway safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceSAFO 14001 — Cessna Citation CE-500 Type Aircraft Aileron Trim Systems
Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for flight controls and automation. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceSAFO 14002 — SAFO 14002, Global Positioning System ( GPS )/Global Navigation Satellite System ( GNSS ) Navigator/Autopilot Compatibility
Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for flight controls and automation and navigation and surveillance. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceSAFO 11004 — Runway Incursion Prevention Actions
Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for approach and landing and runway safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceSAFO 11009 — Runway Status Lights ( RWSL ), for posting on the FAA public website for SAFOs
Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for approach and landing and runway safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.
Open official sourceLessons learned
1Pitch attitude alone does not describe clearance
2A suspected strike requires technical follow-up even if handling appears normal