Safety ManagementIntelligence brief

Flight Data Monitoring

Turn routine flight data into validated, de-identified safety intelligence through questions, event logic, analysis, action, and feedback.

Knowledge connections
8FDM parameters
3Occurrence cases
34Evidence records
4Related topics
01 / Overview

Definition

The systematic, proactive use of digital flight data from routine operations to improve safety; FOQA is the term commonly used for such voluntary programmes in the United States.

Why it matters

FDM reveals exposure and weak signals that reports alone may miss, while supporting evaluation of safety controls across a fleet.

Research lens

Questions that turn reading into a defensible review

A strong review separates the event description, possible precursors, recorded evidence, approved criteria, and the final safety decision.

01 · Frame

What exactly is being examined?

The systematic, proactive use of digital flight data from routine operations to improve safety; FOQA is the term commonly used for such voluntary programmes in the United States.

02 · Challenge

Which conditions could build the exposure?

Safety questions without usable data; Unvalidated event logic or poor metadata.

03 · Corroborate

What evidence would strengthen the picture?

Data completeness and decode quality Event rate with exposure

04 · Bound

What must remain authoritative?

Current approved aircraft data, operator procedures, investigation findings, and the source document’s own scope control any operational conclusion.

What recorded data can support

Timeline, aircraft state, relationships, and recurrence

Normal acceleration, Radio altitude, Vertical speed, Calibrated airspeed, Pitch attitude, Roll angle, Engine thrust, Autopilot status can contribute to a synchronized event picture when their mappings, units, sampling, and flight-phase logic are validated.

What it cannot establish alone

Cause, intent, compliance, and technical disposition

An FDM alert or pattern is not by itself a causal finding, judgement of individual performance, regulatory conclusion, or aircraft maintenance and airworthiness determination.

What should corroborate it

Reports, approved criteria, context, and authoritative evidence

Combine the recorded picture with applicable procedures, crew and operational reports, weather or airport information, technical evidence, and the linked official publications and investigation sources.

02 / Visual model

Data-to-action loop

FDM creates value only when validated analysis changes a control and its effect is checked.

01Safety question
02Acquire and validate
03Detect/analyze
04Review in context
05Act
06Measure effectiveness
03 / Operational context

Common causes and precursors

  1. Safety questions without usable data

  2. Unvalidated event logic or poor metadata

  3. Weak governance, trust, or action follow-through

Operational risks

  1. R1

    False conclusions

  2. R2

    Loss of workforce trust

  3. R3

    Dashboards disconnected from risk controls

04 / Control strategy

Guidance themes

These are cross-source themes for orientation. Apply only the current, approved material for the aircraft and operation.

  • Start from a safety question
  • Validate signals and denominators
  • Protect data and close the action loop

Safety actions to consider

01

Create joint analyst–pilot–engineering governance

02

Version event definitions

03

Publish data limitations with every result

05 / Flight data monitoring

Parameters that help explain the event

A useful event picture comes from signal relationships—not a single exceedance or a generic threshold.

g

Normal acceleration

A short peak may support detection and engineering review of a suspected high-load landing, but recorder sampling, filtering, sensor location, weight, and aircraft response all affect interpretation.

Open parameter guide ↗
ft

Radio altitude

Radio altitude provides the low-height reference needed to align approach gates, flare, touchdown, warning, and go-around events.

Open parameter guide ↗
ft/min or m/s

Vertical speed

It helps describe energy management, approach stability, flare development, and the severity context of a touchdown.

Open parameter guide ↗
kt

Calibrated airspeed

Speed relative to the applicable target and configuration is central to energy management, approach stability, runway performance, and stall margin.

Open parameter guide ↗
deg

Pitch attitude

Pitch shows rotation, flare, stall response, and potential tail-clearance context when combined with gear geometry and radio altitude.

Open parameter guide ↗
deg

Roll angle

Near the runway, roll angle affects wingtip or engine clearance, crosswind alignment, touchdown sequence, and lateral control margins.

Open parameter guide ↗
% / ratio / aircraft-specific

Engine thrust

Thrust is a primary part of energy control and is essential for understanding approach corrections, takeoff, go-around, and engine malfunctions.

Open parameter guide ↗
discrete / mode

Autopilot status

Mode transitions can explain changes in path, speed protection, pilot expectation, workload, and manual-control readiness.

Open parameter guide ↗

Recommended monitoring questions

Q1

Data completeness and decode quality

Q2

Event rate with exposure

Q3

Action owner, due date, and effectiveness

06 / Investigated occurrences

Cases that add context

ASIP provides a concise learning index. The investigation authority report remains the definitive source.

07 / Public-source reading

Editor-reviewed starting points

These records include a deeper ASIP editorial review. Continue to the full evidence index below for direct matches and broader manufacturer, regulator, and investigation reading.

01
International Civil Aviation Organization · 2018

Safety Management Manual (Doc 9859), Fourth Edition

ICAO's fourth-edition manual explains how safety data, risk management, assurance, culture, and governance work together in State and service-provider safety management.

Official source
02
U.S. Federal Aviation Administration · 2004-04-12

AC 120-82 — Flight Operational Quality Assurance

Active FAA guidance describes one acceptable way to establish a voluntary FOQA programme using de-identified aggregate flight data to identify and reduce operational risk.

Official source
03
UK Civil Aviation Authority · 2013-06-28

CAP 739 — Flight Data Monitoring, Second Edition

CAP 739 presents FDM as the systematic, proactive use of routine digital flight data within a non-punitive, just safety culture.

Official source
Directly matched8

Title or indexed metadata explicitly matches this topic.

Broader reading26

Related collection material for adjacent systems, phases, and defenses.

Publishers represented5

Manufacturer, regulator, investigation, and safety-organization sources.

Coverage lens

Where the reading comes from

U.S. Federal Aviation Administration20
Airbus Safety First10
International Civil Aviation Organization2
UK Civil Aviation Authority1
Boeing1

34 source records

Official links · no copied report files

34 source records match the current evidence filters.

International Civil Aviation OrganizationDirect topic match

Annex 19 — Safety Management, Third Edition

Annex 19 consolidates ICAO safety-management provisions, including State safety responsibilities, SMS, safety-data collection and processing, and the protection and sharing of safety information.

StandardNov 2025icao-annex-19
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationDirect topic match

AC 120-92D — Safety Management Systems for Aviation Service Providers

FAA guidance explains performance-based, scalable approaches to integrating safety policy, risk management, assurance, and promotion into aviation organizations.

GuidanceMay 2024faa-ac-120-92d
Open official source
Airbus Safety FirstDirect topic match

High Load Event Reporting

The Airbus Safety First article explains why a pilot report remains central after a suspected high-load event and how recorded reports and analysis tools can support the applicable maintenance process.

Manufacturer articleMar 2018airbus-high-load-reporting
Open official source
International Civil Aviation OrganizationDirect topic match

Safety Management Manual (Doc 9859), Fourth Edition

ICAO's fourth-edition manual explains how safety data, risk management, assurance, culture, and governance work together in State and service-provider safety management.

Guidance2018icao-doc-9859
Open official source
UK Civil Aviation AuthorityDirect topic match

CAP 739 — Flight Data Monitoring, Second Edition

CAP 739 presents FDM as the systematic, proactive use of routine digital flight data within a non-punitive, just safety culture.

GuidanceJun 2013uk-caa-cap-739
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationDirect topic match

AC 120-82 — Flight Operational Quality Assurance

Active FAA guidance describes one acceptable way to establish a voluntary FOQA programme using de-identified aggregate flight data to identify and reduce operational risk.

GuidanceApr 2004faa-ac-120-82
Open official source
Airbus Safety FirstDirect topic match

Flight Data Analysis (FDA), a Predictive Tool for Safety Management System (SMS)

Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for maintenance and flight data and sms. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Manufacturer articleDate on source
Open official source
Airbus Safety FirstDirect topic match

Learning from the evidence

Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for aviation safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Manufacturer articleDate on source
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 21004 — SAFO 21004, Air Traffic Control (ATC) Notification and Pilot Awareness When Conducting an Instrument Landing System (ILS) Autoland Procedure

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for approach and landing and human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2021SAFO 21004
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 20014 — SAFO 20014, Boeing 737-8 and 737-9 Airplanes: Pilot Training and Flight Simulation Training Devices ( FSTD ) Updates

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2020SAFO 20014
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 18004 — SAFO 18004, Rotorcraft External Load Attaching Means and Quick Release Devices for Human External Cargo ( HEC )

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for cabin and cargo and human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2018SAFO 18004
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 18013 — SAFO 18013, Updated Rotorcraft External Load Attaching Means and Quick Release Devices for Human External Cargo ( HEC )

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for cabin and cargo and human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2018SAFO 18013
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 17001 — SAFO 17001, Pilot and Flightcrew Awareness of Class B Airspace Boundaries

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2017SAFO 17001
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 15004 — SAFO 15004, Scenario-Based Go-Around Training

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2015SAFO 15004
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 11010 — TCAS II Guidance and Training for Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR ) Part 135 and Part 125 Certificate Holders, Part 125 Letter of Deviation Authority ( LODA ) holders (125M), Part 91 Subpart K, (91K) Program Managers, Part 91 Operators and Part 142 Training Centers

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for navigation and surveillance and human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2011SAFO 11010
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 10006 — In-Flight Icing Operations and Training Recommendations

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for weather and human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2010SAFO 10006
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 09014 — Concepts for Fatigue Countermeasures in Part 121 and 135 Short-Haul Operations

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2009SAFO 09014
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 09015 — Training For Maximum Performance Landings on Contaminated Runways

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2009SAFO 09015
Open official source
08 / Synthesis

Lessons learned

1An event counter is not safety intelligence

2Trust and technical validity are both programme infrastructure