Human FactorsIntelligence brief

Human Factors and Fatigue

Study how workload, fatigue, expectation, communication, interface design, and organizational conditions shape performance.

Knowledge connections
4FDM parameters
4Occurrence cases
33Evidence records
4Related topics
01 / Overview

Definition

The interaction of people with tasks, technology, environment, teams, and organizations; fatigue is a physiological state that can reduce alertness and performance.

Why it matters

Safety outcomes rarely reflect a single error; they emerge from conditions that support or erode detection, decisions, coordination, and recovery.

Research lens

Questions that turn reading into a defensible review

A strong review separates the event description, possible precursors, recorded evidence, approved criteria, and the final safety decision.

01 · Frame

What exactly is being examined?

The interaction of people with tasks, technology, environment, teams, and organizations; fatigue is a physiological state that can reduce alertness and performance.

02 · Challenge

Which conditions could build the exposure?

Sleep loss, circadian disruption, and workload; Expectation or continuation bias.

03 · Corroborate

What evidence would strengthen the picture?

Schedule and fatigue-risk context where lawful Decision points, callouts, workload, and mode transitions

04 · Bound

What must remain authoritative?

Current approved aircraft data, operator procedures, investigation findings, and the source document’s own scope control any operational conclusion.

What recorded data can support

Timeline, aircraft state, relationships, and recurrence

Vertical speed, Calibrated airspeed, Engine thrust, Autopilot status can contribute to a synchronized event picture when their mappings, units, sampling, and flight-phase logic are validated.

What it cannot establish alone

Cause, intent, compliance, and technical disposition

An FDM alert or pattern is not by itself a causal finding, judgement of individual performance, regulatory conclusion, or aircraft maintenance and airworthiness determination.

What should corroborate it

Reports, approved criteria, context, and authoritative evidence

Combine the recorded picture with applicable procedures, crew and operational reports, weather or airport information, technical evidence, and the linked official publications and investigation sources.

02 / Visual model

Performance-shaping conditions

Task, team, technology, environment, and organization influence what people can perceive and do.

01Operational conditions
02Attention and workload
03Team coordination
04Decision
05Action
06System feedback
03 / Operational context

Common causes and precursors

  1. Sleep loss, circadian disruption, and workload

  2. Expectation or continuation bias

  3. Ambiguous interfaces, roles, or communication

Operational risks

  1. R1

    Reduced monitoring

  2. R2

    Delayed decisions

  3. R3

    Procedural drift and weak recovery

04 / Control strategy

Guidance themes

These are cross-source themes for orientation. Apply only the current, approved material for the aircraft and operation.

  • Manage fatigue through the approved system
  • Design strong cross-checks and calls
  • Investigate conditions, not blame labels

Safety actions to consider

01

Use confidential reporting and LOSA/FDM insights

02

Improve interface and procedure design

03

Test controls in realistic scenarios

05 / Flight data monitoring

Parameters that help explain the event

A useful event picture comes from signal relationships—not a single exceedance or a generic threshold.

Recommended monitoring questions

Q1

Schedule and fatigue-risk context where lawful

Q2

Decision points, callouts, workload, and mode transitions

06 / Investigated occurrences

Cases that add context

ASIP provides a concise learning index. The investigation authority report remains the definitive source.

07 / Public-source reading

Editor-reviewed starting points

These records include a deeper ASIP editorial review. Continue to the full evidence index below for direct matches and broader manufacturer, regulator, and investigation reading.

01
International Civil Aviation Organization · 2018

Safety Management Manual (Doc 9859), Fourth Edition

ICAO's fourth-edition manual explains how safety data, risk management, assurance, culture, and governance work together in State and service-provider safety management.

Official source
02
Flight Safety Foundation · 2017

Go-Around Decision-Making and Execution Project — Final Report

The Flight Safety Foundation project examines go-around policy compliance, decision biases, operational pressures, and the risks that also need to be managed during go-around execution.

Official source
Directly matched10

Title or indexed metadata explicitly matches this topic.

Broader reading23

Related collection material for adjacent systems, phases, and defenses.

Publishers represented7

Manufacturer, regulator, investigation, and safety-organization sources.

Coverage lens

Where the reading comes from

U.S. Federal Aviation Administration18
Airbus Safety First9
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board2
International Civil Aviation Organization1
European Union Aviation Safety Agency1
Flight Safety Foundation1

33 source records

Official links · no copied report files

33 source records match the current evidence filters.

European Union Aviation Safety AgencyDirect topic match

Annual Safety Review 2025

EASA's review uses occurrence and accident information to describe performance across aviation domains and to support the European safety-risk-management process.

Safety reviewAug 2025easa-asr-2025
Open official source
International Civil Aviation OrganizationDirect topic match

Safety Management Manual (Doc 9859), Fourth Edition

ICAO's fourth-edition manual explains how safety data, risk management, assurance, culture, and governance work together in State and service-provider safety management.

Guidance2018icao-doc-9859
Open official source
Flight Safety FoundationDirect topic match

Go-Around Decision-Making and Execution Project — Final Report

The Flight Safety Foundation project examines go-around policy compliance, decision biases, operational pressures, and the risks that also need to be managed during go-around execution.

Toolkit2017fsf-go-around-project
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationDirect topic match

SAFO 09014 — Concepts for Fatigue Countermeasures in Part 121 and 135 Short-Haul Operations

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2009SAFO 09014
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationDirect topic match

SAFO 06004 — Approach and landing accident reduction: Sterile cockpit, fatigue

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for approach and landing and human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2006SAFO 06004
Open official source
U.S. National Transportation Safety BoardDirect topic match

NTSB Safety Alert SA-018 — Preventing Rote Callouts

Official U.S. National Transportation Safety Board material indexed for aviation safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety alertDate on sourceSA-018
Open official source
U.S. National Transportation Safety BoardDirect topic match

NTSB Safety Alert SA-040 — Understanding Flight Experience

Official U.S. National Transportation Safety Board material indexed for aviation safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety alertDate on sourceSA-040
Open official source
Airbus Safety FirstDirect topic match

Preparing Flight Crews to Face Unexpected Events

Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for aviation safety. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Manufacturer articleDate on source
Open official source
Airbus Safety FirstDirect topic match

Situation awareness and decision making

Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Manufacturer articleDate on source
Open official source
Airbus Safety FirstDirect topic match

Training Pilots for Resilience

Official Airbus Safety First material indexed for human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Manufacturer articleDate on source
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 21004 — SAFO 21004, Air Traffic Control (ATC) Notification and Pilot Awareness When Conducting an Instrument Landing System (ILS) Autoland Procedure

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for approach and landing and human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2021SAFO 21004
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 20014 — SAFO 20014, Boeing 737-8 and 737-9 Airplanes: Pilot Training and Flight Simulation Training Devices ( FSTD ) Updates

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2020SAFO 20014
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 18004 — SAFO 18004, Rotorcraft External Load Attaching Means and Quick Release Devices for Human External Cargo ( HEC )

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for cabin and cargo and human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2018SAFO 18004
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 18013 — SAFO 18013, Updated Rotorcraft External Load Attaching Means and Quick Release Devices for Human External Cargo ( HEC )

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for cabin and cargo and human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2018SAFO 18013
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 17001 — SAFO 17001, Pilot and Flightcrew Awareness of Class B Airspace Boundaries

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2017SAFO 17001
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 15004 — SAFO 15004, Scenario-Based Go-Around Training

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2015SAFO 15004
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 11010 — TCAS II Guidance and Training for Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR ) Part 135 and Part 125 Certificate Holders, Part 125 Letter of Deviation Authority ( LODA ) holders (125M), Part 91 Subpart K, (91K) Program Managers, Part 91 Operators and Part 142 Training Centers

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for navigation and surveillance and human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2011SAFO 11010
Open official source
U.S. Federal Aviation AdministrationBroader collection match

SAFO 10006 — In-Flight Icing Operations and Training Recommendations

Official U.S. Federal Aviation Administration material indexed for weather and human factors. Open the publisher source for the complete document, scope, and current status.

Safety Alert for Operators2010SAFO 10006
Open official source
08 / Synthesis

Lessons learned

1Telling people to be more careful is a weak control

2Good systems make the safe action visible, credible, and achievable